Books - Ancient World

Including using "English From The Roots Up," "God & the History of Art," & Composer Studies
Post Reply
rjsmomma
Posts: 21
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2011 10:14 am

Books - Ancient World

Unread post by rjsmomma » Sat Jul 09, 2011 4:22 pm

lisaha wrote:What is the Internet linked CTG Ancient World book like? Is there anything in it that would go against the Biblical belief of creation? I do love the pictures in Usborne books, and my children love them and often take them to their rooms to reread them, so I just want to double check on it! ;)
Okay, it's been a little while since I've used this book (about a year - plenty of time for me to forget!!!:). I believe it does start from an old earth perspective (which MFW skips), so yes, that might be a consideration.

We loved the books though and my dd was a bit older when we used it (around 9-10) and understood the different views that people have on old/young earth and evolution/creation etc, so it wasn't a problem for us.
Shannon Meyer
DD - 13 years old - 7th grade
Used MFW for K, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, and now 7th:)

Julie in MN
Posts: 2925
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2004 3:44 pm
Location: Minnesota

Re: CTG Ancient World

Unread post by Julie in MN » Sun Jul 10, 2011 12:01 pm

Usborne has a book that goes "before" Ancient World (it's called Prehistoric World), so Ancient World picks up with "history." Therefore, there won't be a huge section on their interpretation of pre-history. However, when we did CTG, there was a sentence or two here & there that reflected their ideas. There were warnings in the CTG manual in case we wanted to adjust. I just picked my CTG manual up and Ancient World is first used on the last day of week 3, and the CTG manual says, "In today's reading, we suggest that you substitute "After the flood, people settled in the wide valley..." for the first sentence."

If this is still a concern, I might suggest a few options:

(1) You not put the book on the shelf for free reading until after you have read it as a family this year. That will also keep it fresh each time you read it aloud, anyways.
(2) Or, wait until week 3-4 when you actually start using it, to put it on the shelf. By then, the foundation of studying creation will have been done from weeks 1-3.
(3) Another idea would be to go thru the book yourself and pre-read. This won't take much time, as it's a quick read and the changes will be few.
(4) Or, go thru the CTG manual and make the suggested changes using a marker and pen. You will just need to look at the grids for weeks 3 to 34, for places that it says "Ancient World-see notes." So this would just be skimming one row (history) on 31 pages.


Julie
Julie, married 29 yrs, finding our way without Shane
(http://www.CaringBridge.org/visit/ShaneHansell)
Reid (21) college student; used MFW 3rd-12th grades (2004-2014)
Alexandra (29) mother; hs from 10th grade (2002)
Travis (32) engineer; never hs

lisaha
Posts: 35
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2009 3:04 pm

Re: CTG Ancient World

Unread post by lisaha » Sun Jul 10, 2011 5:53 pm

Thank you! These are good suggestions! :) I do like the idea of having the picture book-especially with my so many boys who are visual! I'm grateful that there are notes and wonderful suggestions to help make a secular book work for a Biblical perspective.

Cyndi (AZ)
Posts: 543
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 4:22 pm

Ancient World

Unread post by Cyndi (AZ) » Tue Jan 24, 2012 11:45 am

When we hit questionable "times" (heh heh) in a book, I just lean back and let her go --- "Oh really? Well, wouldn't it have been difficult for people to visit North America 15,000 years ago when it didn't even EXIST yet?!" We need to work on debating while still being respectful . . .

Either my dd or I sharpie out the incorrect info and she usually scratches in some appropriate rewording. I think it's a great way to show her that the Bible is the only book without errors. As far as handing off Ancient World for her to take and read on her own, I wouldn't do that - not at 9yo. If she wants to look at a particular page to copy a picture or something, that's fine, but I don't see it as independent reading.
2018/19: US1877
used MFW from K through WHL

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests